Inquest into the Death of Matthew James BALE
Deceased
Matthew James BALE
Demographics
38y, male
Date of death
2016-03-21
Finding date
2019-08-01
Cause of death
Unascertained; death in the waters of the Indian Ocean off Rottnest Island
AI-generated summary
Matthew James Bale, a 38-year-old man, disappeared from Rottnest Island on 21 March 2016 while on holiday with his wife and parents. He had a history of depression, alcohol and drug addiction, and recent drug-induced psychosis for which he was prescribed lurasidone. After an argument with his wife about hidden alcohol, he left the accommodation intoxicated, met two women, purchased wine, and indicated he would swim back to Perth. He was last seen heading toward another bay and did not return. Extensive searches found no trace. The coroner found death established beyond reasonable doubt from entering the Indian Ocean, likely by misadventure rather than suicide. Clinical lessons include recognising the vulnerability of individuals with concurrent substance use disorders, mental health conditions, and acute intoxication, and the importance of risk assessment and safety planning in such cases.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Alcohol intoxication at time of disappearance
- Ongoing methylamphetamine use despite recent rehabilitation
- Drug-induced psychosis
- History of depression
- Recent treatment with lurasidone for psychosis
- Interpersonal conflict with wife regarding substance use
- Emotional distress and statements suggesting hopelessness
- Impaired judgment and impulsive decision-making
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —