Inquest Finding into the Death of David John PIETRALA
Deceased
David John PIETRALA
Demographics
34y, male
Date of death
2016-02-11
Finding date
2019-09-03
Cause of death
multiple injuries sustained in motorcycle crash
AI-generated summary
A 34-year-old experienced motorcycle rider died from multiple injuries sustained in a crash while evading police. Officers initiated a brief 60-second pursuit after observing speeding on residential roads. The deceased accelerated to 114-169 km/h through a 70 km/h zone, lost control at an intersection, and crashed into a median strip. The coroner found no breach of police emergency driving guidelines and no police contribution to the death. The deceased was riding at excessive speed, had consumed alcohol (0.046% blood level), and was disqualified from driving. The crash resulted from the deceased's decision to evade police and ride at dangerous speeds, not from police actions. While the coroner noted the Internal Affairs investigation could have been more thorough through formal interviews, no clinical breaches were identified.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- excessive speed (114-169 km/h in 70 km/h zone)
- loss of control while evading police
- alcohol consumption (blood alcohol 0.046%)
- possible effects of diazepam and mirtazapine
- disqualified driving status motivating evasion
Coroner's recommendations
- Noted that Internal Affairs Unit should have formally interviewed the police officers directly involved in critical incidents, not merely reviewed statements and documentary evidence, to ensure thorough investigation of police conduct
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —