Inquest into the Death of David CULLEN
Deceased
David CULLEN
Demographics
69y, male
Date of death
1972-01-14
Finding date
2019-09-05
Cause of death
Unable to determine—death established but manner and cause unknown (natural causes, accident, or misadventure possible)
AI-generated summary
David Cullen, aged 69, disappeared on 14 January 1972 while walking to a watering hole on the Fortescue River in remote Western Australia. He was last seen wearing only khaki shorts, intending to swim. His dogs returned alone. Despite search efforts including ground tracking and aerial reconnaissance, no remains were found. The coroner established death beyond reasonable doubt based on: the 47-year absence without contact, lack of evidence of voluntary disappearance, family inquiries in Scotland finding no trace, immigration records showing no border crossing, and the remote location making survival unlikely. The coroner was unable to determine the specific cause or manner of death—whether natural causes, accident, or misadventure—due to absence of remains. An open finding was recorded. This case illustrates challenges in investigating missing persons in remote areas and the importance of proper documentation and coordinated search protocols.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Contributing factors
- Remote location far from medical assistance
- Extreme heat and harsh terrain conditions
- Inadequate documentation of initial search efforts in 1972
- Inexperienced search pilot who may have flown too high
- Lack of centralized missing persons database in 1972
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —