Coronial
WAother

Inquest into the Death of Bret Lindsay CAPPER

Deceased

Bret Lindsay CAPPER

Demographics

43y, male

Date of death

2016-01-14

Finding date

2019-11-13

Cause of death

bronchopneumonia and brain swelling following ligature compression of the neck (hanging)

AI-generated summary

Bret Lindsay Capper, 43-year-old male remanded in custody at Hakea Prison, Western Australia, died on 14 January 2016 from bronchopneumonia and brain swelling following ligature asphyxiation by hanging. He had antisocial personality disorder, chronic suicidality, and three recent suicide attempts by overdose before incarceration. Although initially placed on appropriate ARMS moderate monitoring after intake risk assessment, he was removed from ARMS on 20 October 2015 and crucially not transitioned to SAMS despite meeting clear eligibility criteria (chronic suicide risk, difficulty coping with custody). Prison Counselling Service (PCS) resources were critically insufficient (6-7 staff for 955 prisoners), preventing the ongoing therapeutic counselling he required and had been identified as needing. A mental health team meeting on 23 November 2015 operated under the false assumption he was receiving PCS support—an assumption that could have been corrected had PCS staff attended. Clinical lessons include: inadequate placement on secondary suicide prevention systems, insufficient mental health resources in custodial settings, lack of multidisciplinary information-sharing, and failure to provide evidence-based psychological interventions for vulnerable prisoners with personality disorders and chronic suicide risk.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • inadequate placement on SAMS after removal from ARMS despite meeting eligibility criteria
  • insufficient Prison Counselling Service staffing preventing ongoing therapeutic interventions
  • failure to provide long-term counselling for personality disorder despite identified need
  • lack of reciprocal access between PCS and mental health computer systems
  • false assumption by mental health team that deceased was receiving PCS support
  • PCS staff non-attendance at mental health team meetings
  • difficulty coping with custody and anticipation of lengthy prison sentence
  • social isolation and limited protective factors
  • lack of ligature minimisation in communal areas
  • misunderstanding by staff about SAMS eligibility criteria

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Review SOG deployment procedure and consider reverting to previous system allowing direct contact between prison officers in charge and SOG
  2. Take urgent steps to recruit the nine approved additional PCS staff and consider appropriate staffing levels for prisons across Western Australia
  3. Ensure PCS and Prison Health Service staff have reciprocal access to prisoner information in EcHO and Total Offender Management Solutions systems without delay
  4. Expand information sessions about SOG role (currently delivered to prison health staff) to custodial officers
  5. Provide critical incident management training to senior custodial officers (senior officers and above)
  6. Consult with mental health experts to provide training to custodial staff on personality disorders and mental health conditions, with strategies to better manage affected prisoners
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —