Coronial
WAhospital

Inquest into the Death of Theodore Herbert Eric JOHANSEN

Deceased

Theodore Herbert Eric JOHANSEN

Demographics

50y, male

Date of death

2014-10-29

Finding date

2018-09-10

Cause of death

Drowning

AI-generated summary

Theodore Johansen, a 50-year-old man with a history of anxiety and depression, presented to his GP on 28 October 2014 with active suicidal ideation and a detailed plan to drown himself using a block and chain. He was appropriately referred to Peel Health Campus for assessment. The ED doctor referred him to a psychiatric liaison nurse, who assessed him as low risk after he denied family history of mental illness and suicide, appeared calm and composed, and stated he no longer felt suicidal. He was discharged home with a community management plan. He died by drowning the same night, using the apparatus he claimed to have dismantled. Critical clinical lessons: the deceased concealed significant family history (brother's suicide) and the assessment occurred on that brother's birthday; collateral information was not obtained due to patient confidentiality concerns; the deceased's demeanour was reassuring but ultimately misleading; and family members were not adequately informed about risks or warning signs. The case highlights the difficulty of suicide risk assessment, the importance of comprehensive information gathering, and the tension between respecting patient confidentiality and protecting safety.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Active suicidal ideation with detailed plan not previously disclosed
  • Concealment of significant family history of mental illness and suicide by deceased
  • Assessment occurred on the deceased's brother's birthday (unrecognised by clinicians)
  • Lack of collateral information from family or treating psychologist
  • Patient refusal to allow discussion with family members due to embarrassment and custody concerns
  • Deceased's reassuring demeanour and presentation masking underlying risk
  • Return to stressful home environment immediately after discharge
  • Lack of family involvement in discharge planning and risk communication
  • Incomplete psychiatric assessment documentation

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Ensure comprehensive documentation of all psychiatric assessments and management plans in medical records
  2. Implement procedures to record in nursing documentation when psychiatric liaison nurses or doctors request notification of patient discharge, to ensure follow-up communication with family occurs
  3. Use electronic flagging systems in ED patient tracking when discharge communication is required
  4. Develop and adopt scripted wording for ED staff to encourage patients to remain for psychiatric assessment, avoiding language such as 'putting on forms' which may cause patients to become guarded and less willing to disclose symptoms
  5. Maintain and strengthen policy requiring consultation with consultant psychiatrists when patients are referred by medical practitioners for admission or assessment
  6. Encourage more flexible approaches to obtaining collateral information, including broader discretion to breach confidentiality when essential risk factors may be omitted by the patient
  7. Improve access to psychiatrists for face-to-face assessment in ED settings
  8. Consider designated areas or streaming for mental health patients in ED to allow more comprehensive assessment in appropriate environment
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —