Coronial
WAhospital

Inquest into the Death of LCTM

Deceased

LCTM

Demographics

0y, male

Coroner

Coroner Linton

Date of death

2014-02-24

Finding date

2018-06-25

Cause of death

complications of head injury

AI-generated summary

A premature newborn died from severe head injuries inflicted deliberately by his teenage father in hospital on 15 February 2014. The father had a well-documented history of violence, substance abuse, criminality and had been in Department of Child Protection care. Pre-birth planning was delayed due to late referral and competing caseloads. Following a Code Black incident at hospital involving the father's violence, the Department decided insufficient grounds existed to take the baby into care despite acknowledged high-risk factors. The father was subsequently allowed unsupervised contact. Clinical lessons include: early identification of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (later diagnosed) might have altered risk assessment; communication failures between agencies (Perth-based case worker not adequately involved in planning); incomplete information due to family non-disclosure of domestic violence; and failure to document a warning sign (rough feeding incident causing mouth injury two days before death). Hospital and Department processes have since been substantially revised, including 'Babies at Risk' multidisciplinary meetings and improved interagency communication protocols.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

neonatologypaediatricsmidwiferypsychiatryforensic medicineneurology

Error types

communicationsystemdiagnosticdelay

Clinical conditions

fetal alcohol spectrum disorderintellectual disabilitytraumatic brain injuryskull fracturessubdural haemorrhagebrain swelling

Contributing factors

  • father's fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and cognitive impairment
  • father's history of violence and substance abuse
  • failure to diagnose father's FASD prior to death
  • delayed pre-birth planning due to late referral
  • Department caseload and workload issues
  • incomplete information gathering regarding father's history of violence
  • family non-disclosure of domestic violence
  • communication failures between Perth-based and Bunbury-based caseworkers
  • failure to involve father's Cannington case manager in planning meetings
  • failure to appoint a co-worker for father despite request
  • lack of supervision of unsupervised parental contact
  • failure to document warning sign (rough feeding incident)
  • decision not to take baby into care despite high-risk factors

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Early pre-birth planning should be prioritised where an unborn baby may be at risk
  2. Where early pre-birth planning cannot be undertaken, a cautious approach should be taken to assessing risk
  3. Department for Child Protection and Family Support should take a precautionary approach where there is insufficient information about a case and potential for dangerous outcome
  4. Department should review methods of maintaining contact with highly vulnerable and transient youth and direct sufficient resources to monitoring location of troubled children
  5. Multidisciplinary team at senior level should make decisions about allowing individuals back to hospital wards after Code Black incidents
  6. Hospital and Department processes should include documentation of decision-making regarding de-escalation of security incidents
  7. Regular 'Babies at Risk' collaborative meetings between Department case workers and hospital social workers/midwives should be maintained
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.