Coronial
WAhome

Inquest into the Death of Christine Pearl STRONER

Deceased

Christine Pearl STRONER

Demographics

69y, female

Date of death

2013-04-03

Finding date

2017-02-17

Cause of death

unascertained

AI-generated summary

Christine Pearl Stroner, 69, died of an unascertained cause on the evening of discharge following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hiatus hernia repair at Fremantle Hospital. She was observed at 2pm with tachycardia (HR 111) and pain (10/10), given oxycodone, and reviewed by an unidentified doctor around 3pm with no recorded documentation. She was discharged to home at 4.10pm and died at 9.15pm the same day. While the coroner found the clinical decision to discharge was likely appropriate based on pain-related tachycardia responding to analgesia, significant concerns included the failure to document the pre-discharge doctor's assessment and inadequate investigations when tachycardia persisted. The coroner noted that while survival would have been marginally better if the patient remained hospitalised, this would have required continuous monitoring unlikely in standard ward settings. The care was ultimately found adequate, though documentation failures left the hospital open to suspicion.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • post-operative complications
  • significant pre-existing comorbidities
  • tachycardia at 111 bpm post-operatively
  • possible cardiac arrhythmia
  • possible sudden cardiac death
  • inadequate documentation of pre-discharge assessment
  • failure to perform investigations on persistent tachycardia despite adequate analgesia
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —