Coronial
WAother

Inquest into the Death of Simon John ROWE

Deceased

Simon John ROWE

Demographics

37y, male

Date of death

2012-04-12

Finding date

2016-11-04

Cause of death

multiple injuries in a man with methylamphetamine effect (suicide by jumping from window)

AI-generated summary

Simon John Rowe, a 37-year-old man with a history of drug use and imprisonment, died by suicide on 12 April 2012 after deliberately jumping from a 12th-floor hotel window during a police siege. He had smashed the window, thrown items onto the roof below, and set fires in the room. Police and fire services attended, with tactical officers attempting non-lethal incapacitation using bean bag rounds and a Taser to prevent him accessing the window. The coroner found police actions were warranted and that Simon deliberately jumped of his own volition while under the influence of methylamphetamine. The case illustrates the challenges emergency services face in suicide interventions, the limitations of non-lethal force in preventing determined self-harm, and the importance of rapid assessment when fire and smoke create immediate risk to other occupants and responders.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • methylamphetamine intoxication
  • depression and suicidal ideation
  • lack of access to son and relationship difficulties
  • inability to maintain employment following work injury
  • history of imprisonment and criminal involvement
  • substance use disorder
  • paranoid thinking exacerbated by drug use
  • fire and smoke creating urgent operational pressure on police response
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —