Coronial
WAhome

Inquest into the Death of Baby P

Deceased

Baby P

Demographics

0y, male

Coroner

Coroner Linton

Date of death

2011-07-03

Finding date

2015-06-08

Cause of death

intrapartum hypoxia due to placental abruption

AI-generated summary

A second twin boy was born at home despite medical advice that twin pregnancies require hospital care. The mother, who strongly preferred home birth, disengaged from hospital when her preferences for birth management (vaginal delivery with first twin breech, no continuous monitoring, no epidural) were not fully accommodated. She engaged an unregistered 'birth advocate' and a registered midwife to attend the home birth. During labour, the baby experienced placental abruption and was born lifeless. Prolonged resuscitation in the community delayed optimal care. Medical experts agreed hospital birth with standard management would very likely have prevented death. Key failures: Hospital staff did not adequately impress the serious risks of twin home birth; the unregistered birth advocate provided reassurance rather than clear warnings; the registered midwife's professional obligations to advocate against the unsafe plan were compromised by her backup role; and inadequate documentation of informed consent for the dangerous decision.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

obstetricsmidwiferyneonatologyemergency medicineparamedicine

Error types

communicationdelaysystem

Clinical conditions

twin pregnancyplacental abruptionintrapartum asphyxiabreech presentation (first twin)cephalic presentation (second twin)

Procedures

resuscitationintubationcardiopulmonary resuscitationchest compressionsbag-mask ventilationendotracheal intubation

Contributing factors

  • home birth of twin pregnancy (high-risk delivery) without adequate medical supervision or resuscitation facilities
  • placental abruption occurring during delivery
  • unregistered birth advocate providing midwifery services and false reassurance about safety
  • lack of continuous foetal monitoring
  • delayed access to optimal neonatal resuscitation
  • inadequate communication of risks to parents
  • premature cessation of hospital engagement by parents
  • no contemporaneous documentation of informed consent by attendants
  • inadequate antenatal risk counselling by unregistered and registered attendants

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Passage of legislation similar to South Australia's Restricted Birthing Practices Bill to prevent unqualified and unregistered people from providing planned homebirth services, restricting clinical midwifery services to registered midwives or medical practitioners
  2. Improved communication between health professionals and pregnant women to ensure informed choice comes from understanding of both perspectives within context of mutually respectful relationship
  3. Expansion of continuity of care midwifery models to high-risk pregnancies, not just low-risk pregnancies, to encourage engagement with hospital system
  4. Greater flexibility and negotiation in offering birth environment options to high-risk women within hospital settings to prevent them seeking unregulated alternatives
  5. Development of models of care providing midwifery continuity of care for women of all risk factors to reduce women choosing home birth solely to access continuity of care
  6. Increased availability of facilities such as water immersion for pain management during labour in hospital settings, even for higher-risk pregnancies
  7. Emphasis on non-coercive communication and respect for informed choices while ensuring safety remains paramount
  8. Improved training and emphasis on documentation of informed consent discussions when women choose to decline standard medical recommendations
  9. Protection of home birth model through cautious and conservative decision-making to build community confidence
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.