Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of Stephen Ross Gamble

Deceased

Stephen Ross Gamble

Demographics

49y, male

Date of death

2010-07-28

Finding date

2011-09-05

Cause of death

Complications of craniopharyngioma and pan-hypopituitarism

AI-generated summary

Stephen Ross Gamble, a 49-year-old man with long-standing craniopharyngioma and pan-hypopituitarism, resided in a community residential unit. His condition had been deteriorating in the months before July 2010, with multiple episodes of confusion, absconding, and hospital admissions. He was admitted to Austin Hospital on 6 July with seizures and low blood pressure, then transferred to the Repatriation Hospital's Palliative Care Unit for symptom management and end-of-life care. He developed aspiration pneumonia and died on 28 July 2010. The coroner found no autopsy necessary, with external examination and postmortem CT scanning confirming the cause as complications of craniopharyngioma and pan-hypopituitarism. Significantly, the coroner found no suggestion that any want of clinical care or management contributed to death. The death was subject to coronial investigation because Mr Gamble was a person in state care, providing scrutiny and accountability of care provided to vulnerable people.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • seizure activity
  • hypothermia
  • aspiration pneumonia
  • progressive neurological deterioration
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —