Finding into death of Peter John Bannan
Deceased
Peter John Bannan
Demographics
54y, male
Date of death
2007-10-20
Finding date
2010-04-28
Cause of death
Pneumonia
AI-generated summary
Peter Bannan, age 54, had lifelong quadriplegia and intellectual disability from early childhood encephalitis, with chronic epilepsy and severe aspiration risk. He was admitted on 5 October 2007 with aspiration pneumonia, treated with antibiotics and fluids. His condition did not improve by 9 October, and the medical team initiated palliative care in consultation with his family, withdrawing medications and fluids to provide comfort measures. He died on 20 October 2007. The coroner identified a significant administrative failure: hospital staff failed to identify that Mr Bannan had a legally appointed medical guardian with specific end-of-life decision-making authority, and therefore did not consult him before implementing palliation. The required alert form in his medical record was absent. However, the coroner found this procedural failure did not impact the medical outcome, and the hospital subsequently acknowledged and targeted these issues for improvement.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Contributing factors
- Failure to identify medical guardian in hospital records
- Absence of alert form from medical record
- Failure to consult with legal guardian before implementing palliation
- Chronic aspiration risk due to swallowing difficulties
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —