Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of MICHAEL GOLDMAN

Deceased

MICHAEL GOLDMAN

Demographics

60y, male

Date of death

2008-09-29

Finding date

2010-05-17

Cause of death

Metastatic carcinoma of the prostate

AI-generated summary

Michael Goldman was a 60-year-old prisoner at Port Phillip Prison who died of metastatic prostate cancer. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in September 2006 and underwent brachytherapy in mid-2007. By May 2008, progressive bony metastatic disease was identified and he underwent orchidectomy at St Vincent's Hospital. He was seen by oncology in August 2008 and commenced on hormonal therapy, which failed to control the cancer. He was transferred back to St Vincent's Hospital on 25 September 2008 for palliative care and died on 29 September 2008. The coroner found he died of natural causes and that examination of medical records did not support allegations of negligence or failure to provide proper and prompt medical interventions. However, a systemic failure was identified: Justice Health failed to implement Chronic Health Care Plans for this prisoner with multiple chronic conditions, though this failure would not have affected the health outcome.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Advanced metastatic prostate cancer with bony metastases
  • Hypercalcemia from bone metastases
  • Systemic failure to implement Chronic Health Care Plans

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That Justice Health ensure and monitor the implementation of Chronic Health Care Plans, where indicated, by all Justice Health's contracted care providers
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —