Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of LUCIA DI PIETRO

Deceased

LUCIA DI PIETRO

Demographics

42y, female

Date of death

2010-08-04

Finding date

2012-08-16

Cause of death

Global hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury due to upper airway obstruction by food bolus

AI-generated summary

Lucia Di Pietro, a 42-year-old woman with severe autism and epilepsy living in Department of Human Services disability accommodation, choked on roast beef during supervised dinner on 1 August 2010. Emergency services arrived within 3 minutes; paramedics removed large amounts of meat from her larynx and trachea using forceps, but airway clearance took 2–3 minutes. Despite clearing the obstruction, she suffered cardiac arrest, was resuscitated with CPR and adrenaline, and intubated. Transferred to Austin Hospital ICU for therapeutic cooling due to severe hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury, she showed no meaningful recovery potential. Treatment was withdrawn on 4 August 2010. The coroner found she died from complications of the food bolus obstruction.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Choking on roast beef
  • Large obstruction in airway
  • Delay in airway clearance
  • Subsequent cardiac arrest
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —