Coronial
VICaged care

Lilllianelizabethripper 456812pdf

Deceased

Lillian Elizabeth Ripper

Demographics

92y, female

Date of death

2012-10-26

Finding date

2013-11-18

Cause of death

Complications of congestive cardiac failure (palliated) in an elderly woman with a history of frailty, recurrent chest infections and possible urinary tract infection

AI-generated summary

This case involves an elderly woman with congestive cardiac failure, intellectual disability, and multiple comorbidities who died in a Department of Human Services residential care facility. In late September 2012, she developed symptoms of infection and received antibiotic treatment from her GP. Following ED assessment on 3 October, she was discharged with suspected resolving pneumonia and/or UTI. As she did not improve, her GP appropriately referred her to the Melbourne City Mission Palliative Care Team on 11 October. After assessment, palliative care was commenced with morphine. She died of natural causes ten days later. The coroner found no evidence that her death was related to care provision and no medical errors. The death reflected natural deterioration from her underlying cardiac condition.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • congestive cardiac failure
  • frailty
  • recurrent chest infections
  • possible urinary tract infection
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —