David Mulvaney, aged 58, died on 28 July 2007 from 85% thermal burns sustained in a drum explosion while cutting an empty 44-gallon drum containing thinners in his home shed. The drum, obtained from his workplace, retained flammable residue and vapours which ignited when he used an angle grinder. He was transported to Alfred Hospital with injuries deemed non-survivable and died the same day in ICU under palliative care. The coroner found the cause of death to be burns and explosion, and recommended that WorkSafe Victoria create specific warnings about the dangers of cutting fuel drums or empty containers, similar to warnings already issued in NSW and Queensland. The case highlights the critical importance of proper hazard identification, decontamination procedures, and public education regarding the dangers of working with containers previously containing flammable substances.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Cutting empty drum containing flammable residue and vapours
Use of angle grinder on container with flammable content
Lack of specific safety warnings about cutting fuel drums
Insufficient hazard identification procedures
Inadequate decontamination of drum before cutting
Coroner's recommendations
WorkSafe Victoria consider creating a specific warning about the dangers of cutting fuel drums or empty containers, similar to warnings issued by New South Wales and Queensland
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —