Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of T E

Demographics

34y, male

Date of death

2024-02-22

Finding date

2026-07-29

Cause of death

95% total body surface area burns and inhalational injury sustained in a vehicle fire

AI-generated summary

TE, a 34-year-old male, died on 22 February 2024 from 95% total body surface area burns and inhalational injury sustained in a deliberate vehicle fire on the Monash Freeway. The coroner confirmed this was suicide, noting TE had purchased a jerry can and lighter, transferred money to his partner, and sent farewell emails prior to the incident. While receiving no prior documented mental health care (he lacked a Medicare card), TE had experienced occupational stress and sleep difficulties. Critically, TE was under police investigation for allegations of sexual assault by two female massage clients—a context in which suicide risk is significantly elevated. The first interview occurred in December 2022 (outcome communicated August 2023), and the second in December 2023, two months before his death—a high-risk window. The coroner found police conduct reasonable and compliant with Victorian Police standards. Excellent emergency response from bystanders, paramedics, and hospital staff occurred, but injuries were deemed non-survivable.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • police investigation into allegations of sexual assault
  • occupational stress and sleep difficulties
  • accumulation of stressors from second police interview occurring two months prior to death
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —