Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of VNP

Deceased

VNP

Demographics

41y, female

Date of death

2023-07-10

Finding date

2026-07-01

Cause of death

Injuries sustained in a fall from a height

AI-generated summary

VNP was a 41-year-old woman with longstanding bipolar disorder type 1, chronic pain from endometriosis, and substance misuse history who died by suicide on 10 July 2023. She had experienced homelessness, family estrangement, and loss of custody of her son. While staying in temporary motel accommodation, she attended Dandenong Shopping Centre carpark intoxicated with alcohol and methylamphetamine. Despite timely police response and 67 minutes of professional negotiation, she fell from the rooftop 11.12 metres to pavement below. The coroner commended emergency responders for professionalism and compassion. Comprehensive mental health assessments in the days prior, including ED review and ENGAGE program follow-up on 6 July, revealed no acute suicide risk. The coroner found no preventable factors or opportunities for intervention; acute intoxication significantly contributed to impaired judgment on the day.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Acute alcohol intoxication (0.12 g/100mL)
  • Acute methamphetamine intoxication
  • Chronic Bipolar Affective Disorder Type 1
  • Chronic pain (endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, oligomenorrhea)
  • Homelessness and housing instability
  • Social isolation and family estrangement
  • Loss of custody of son
  • Financial stress
  • Poor sustained engagement with mental health services
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —