Multisystem failure in the setting of hyponatraemia secondary to chronic malnutrition in a woman with multiple medical comorbidities
AI-generated summary
An 81-year-old woman with chronic schizophrenia, heart failure, and dementia died from multisystem failure secondary to severe malnutrition and hyponatraemia. Over four years, her son (Medical Power of Attorney) progressively restricted her diet to steamed vegetables and fruit, discontinued all psychiatric and cardiac medications based on internet research and religious beliefs, and limited her medical consultations. She lost 58% of body weight (89kg to 37kg). Her GP and psychiatrist documented concerns about non-evidence-based dietary restrictions and medication refusal but could not compel compliance. No adult safeguarding mechanism existed to investigate or coordinate a response to her complex care needs. The coroner identified systemic gaps in Victoria's fragmented safeguarding framework and reiterated recommendations for comprehensive adult safeguarding legislation to protect vulnerable adults with care dependencies from neglect by family members.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Severe malnutrition from restricted diet (steamed vegetables and fruit only)
Cessation of all psychiatric medications (risperidone, lurasidone, benztropine, donepezil, amisulpride, diazepam)
Cessation of all cardiac medications (blood thinning agents, heart failure management)
Progressive weight loss of 58% over four years (89kg to 37kg in June 2023)
Hyponatraemia
Untreated atrial fibrillation
Untreated schizophrenia and dementia
Reduced access to medical care (no GP or psychiatrist contact for 12+ months)
Medical Power of Attorney holder directing non-evidence-based care based on internet research and religious beliefs
Loose bowel motions (10-12 per day) contributing to malnutrition
Moderate oropharyngeal dysphagia not addressed prior to acute deterioration
Absence of coordinated adult safeguarding response
Fragmented service system unable to escalate concerns about family-based neglect
Coroner's recommendations
The Victorian Government implement as a priority adult safeguarding legislation to establish adult safeguarding functions including assessment, investigation, and coordination of responses to allegations of abuse, neglect and exploitation of at-risk adults
In framing legislation, the Victorian Government review the circumstances of TBL's death and similar cases together with safeguarding recommendations of ALRC, OPA and Disability Royal Commission
Any new adult safeguarding agencies be adequately funded by the Victorian Government to function effectively
Victorian Government ensure any new safeguarding agency works cooperatively with service providers to facilitate timely provision of support services to at-risk adults
Victorian Government introduce legislation to permit adult safeguarding agency to receive and share information timely including information about neglect with police, healthcare entities, government departments, Office of Public Advocate and other agencies
Victorian Government implement OPA recommendation to build capacity of mainstream service providers to identify and respond to abuse of at-risk adults
Victorian Government make funding available for community awareness, media engagement and education campaigns about new adult safeguarding function
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.