Finding into death of Bahman Nouri
Deceased
Bahman Nouri
Demographics
30y, male
Date of death
2019-08-24
Finding date
2026-10-16
Cause of death
Hanging
AI-generated summary
This case involved a 30-year-old Iranian asylum seeker with acute psychosis who presented to emergency with weapons and paranoid ideation. He was admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit, diagnosed with first-episode psychosis, and commenced on antipsychotics (lurasidone, paliperidone, olanzapine). A language barrier (Farsi) affected initial communication, requiring an interpreter for subsequent reviews. Despite early medication non-compliance (hiding tablets), his regimen was adjusted and mental state improved. The patient was granted structured escorted leave with his cousin Parisa, with gradual increases as he appeared to recover. On 24 August 2019, while on approved leave at his cousin's home, he died by suicide (hanging). The coroner found no deficiencies in psychiatric care or leave planning and stated the death was not preventable. NWMH subsequently enhanced its leave policy and communication strategies for patient supervision.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- First-episode psychosis
- Persecutory delusions
- Medication non-compliance
- Recent family stressors (death of uncle, visa uncertainty)
- Language barrier affecting early assessment
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; where a court PDF has technically defective redaction, the hidden text is removed from our archived copy and the full text is withheld. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —