Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Narelle Marie Compton

Deceased

Narelle Marie Compton

Demographics

57y, female

Coroner

State Coroner Judge Liberty Sanger

Date of death

2025-05-30

Finding date

2025-12-11

Cause of death

Deterioration in setting of advanced dementia on a background of down syndrome

AI-generated summary

A 57-year-old woman with Down syndrome and advanced Alzheimer's dementia died from natural causes following a period of functional decline. She was residing in a Specialist Disability Accommodation facility and receiving supported independent living services. In May 2025, she developed drowsiness, low blood pressure, and was admitted to hospital where she received palliative care until her death. The coroner found no deficiency in clinical management by either the disability support provider or Eastern Health staff. This case highlights the natural progression of advanced dementia in individuals with Down syndrome and the importance of appropriate end-of-life care planning in vulnerable populations.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

palliative caregeneral practiceemergency medicine

Clinical conditions

Down syndromeAlzheimer's dementiaepilepsyosteopeniaintrahepatic cholestasiscerebral atrophyhydrocephalusfatty liverintellectual disability

Contributing factors

  • advanced Alzheimer's dementia
  • Down syndrome
  • functional decline over seven months preceding death
  • marked cerebral atrophy
  • hydrocephalus
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.