Phillip Reidy, 27, died from cyanide toxicity after ingesting sodium cyanide during police arrest for a family violence incident. He had purchased 250g of sodium cyanide online from Bacto Laboratories using false information claiming scientific research purposes. Police were not informed of the cyanide's presence due to an omission in the briefing process. During arrest at his home, while being handcuffed, Reidy requested bathroom access. Once the handcuff was removed, he quickly consumed the cyanide and collapsed within seconds. Despite immediate first aid and paramedic resuscitation efforts, he died at the scene. The coroner found the police response appropriate but criticised Bacto Laboratories for failing to conduct adequate enquiries to verify the false End User Declaration, highlighting regulatory gaps in Schedule 7 poison supply between states.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Inadequate verification of End User Declaration by Bacto Laboratories
Omission of cyanide information from police briefing
Regulatory inconsistency between NSW and Victorian poison schedules
Opportunity to access cyanide during police custody when handcuff was removed
Chronic mental health issues and financial distress
Prior statements of suicidal intent
Coroner's recommendations
Establishment of a nationally unified regulatory approach to Schedule 7 poisons across Australian states and territories
Implementation of structured briefing processes by police to reduce omission of critical safety information
Suppliers of Schedule 7 dangerous poisons should conduct reasonable basic enquiries to verify customer identity and legitimacy of claimed exemptions before supply
Suppliers must ensure regulatory compliance in both the jurisdiction they operate and the jurisdiction to which products are being shipped
In the absence of national uniformity, suppliers should validate the basis upon which customers claim ability to lawfully possess dangerous substances
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —