Finding into death of Arnold Polis
Deceased
Arnold Polis
Demographics
68y, male
Date of death
2024-06-17
Finding date
2025-08-20
Cause of death
Community acquired chest infection secondary to C6 quadriplegia secondary to remote diving accident (1972)
AI-generated summary
Arnold Polis, a 68-year-old man with C6 quadriplegia from a 1972 diving accident, died from community-acquired chest infection complicated by heart failure. He had recurrent respiratory and urinary tract infections related to his spinal cord injury. In May-June 2024, he presented with urinary tract infection, pertussis-associated respiratory infection, and pneumonia. Despite appropriate antibiotic treatment, supplemental oxygen, diuretics, and chest physiotherapy at Box Hill Hospital, his condition deteriorated. The coroner found his medical care was reasonable and appropriate. His death from natural causes reflected the progressive complications of long-standing quadriplegia as he aged, with weakened respiratory effort and immune response. No preventable factors were identified.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Clinical conditions
Procedures
Contributing factors
- C6 quadriplegia with progressive age-related decline in respiratory effort
- Weakened immune response secondary to chronic spinal cord injury
- Recurrent urinary tract infections
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
- Atrial fibrillation
- Autonomic dysreflexia
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —