Asphyxia - Inhalation of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)
AI-generated summary
Mrs R, a 57-year-old woman with bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and depression, died from asphyxia by inhalation of liquefied petroleum gas. On 31 March 2024, family unable to contact her requested a police welfare check. Police obtained information about her mental health history, previous suicide attempts, recent breakdown, and family separation, but determined welfare check was unnecessary as there was no 'imminent and serious harm'. The coroner found the welfare check should have been conducted given her significant risk factors, though likely would not have prevented her death as she had probably already deceased. Key lesson: comprehensive risk assessment in welfare checks requires consideration of accumulated risk factors, not solely recent direct threats. Clear police protocols for welfare check decision-making are essential.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Mental health history including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, depression, suicidal ideation
Previous suicide attempts by carbon monoxide poisoning and self-harm
Recent relationship breakdown and family violence
Recent unusual behaviour and mental health breakdown
No contact with mental health services since 2022
Family unable to conduct welfare check themselves due to distance and Intervention Order
Failure to conduct welfare check despite multiple risk indicators
Coroner's recommendations
The Chief Commissioner of Police develop a chapter for the Victoria Police Manual to provide clear and specific guidance to police members to inform their judgment as to the circumstances in which welfare checks are required to be conducted
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.