Finding into death of Shanjing Xing
Deceased
Shanjing Xing
Demographics
48y, female
Date of death
2023-12-22
Finding date
2025-01-22
Cause of death
Cervical spine injury sustained in a motor vehicle incident
AI-generated summary
A 48-year-old woman died in a motor vehicle accident when the car she was in as a passenger failed to give way at an intersection controlled by a give way sign. The driver, who was unlicensed, collided with a fully loaded truck travelling at the speed limit on the priority road. The impact caused catastrophic injuries including cervical spine dislocation. There was no evidence of alcohol, drugs, fatigue, or road defects contributing to the collision. The coroner concluded the death resulted from the driver's momentary lapse of concentration or failure to observe the give way sign. The coroner noted that rumble strips at the intersection could be a worthy prevention initiative. No clinical errors or system failures were identified as this was a trauma death in the community setting.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Driver's failure to give way at intersection with give way sign
- Momentary lapse of concentration by driver
- Driver did not have Australian driver's licence
- Possible sun glare (though unlikely given time of day and year)
Coroner's recommendations
- Installation of rumble strips on either side of the intersection of Chinkapook-Nyah West Road with Route C251 (Mallee Highway) as a worthy prevention initiative
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —