CM, a 25-year-old woman experiencing depression, anxiety, and substance misuse, died by suicide while in an intimate partner relationship characterised by documented family violence. She presented to hospital multiple times with injuries consistent with assault (fractured vertebra, hand fractures, bruising) and disclosed physical and sexual abuse. Despite these presentations and a high-risk family violence assessment by mental health services, opportunities to identify the pattern of abuse and coordinate responses were missed. Health services lacked integrated systems to flag previous family violence concerns across departments, prompting systematic inquiry on subsequent presentations. The Royal Commission into Family Violence specifically identified health professionals' unique position to recognise and respond to intimate partner violence; implementing family violence screening protocols and risk-flagging systems across hospitals could help identify abuse patterns and coordinate protective responses.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Intimate partner violence including physical assault, sexual coercion, and controlling behaviours
Depression and anxiety from young age
Substance misuse (alcohol and drugs from late teenage years)
Homelessness and housing instability
Employment difficulties and bullying at work
Recent separation/imminent relocation (planned move out of partner's home)
Failure to identify pattern of family violence across multiple hospital presentations
Lack of integrated risk-flagging systems across emergency department presentations
Limited engagement with family violence support services despite high-risk assessment
Coroner's recommendations
That the Victorian Government fund further research into the link between family violence and suicide
That Austin Health further consider the integration of risk 'flags' or other notifications into and across their patient record system where serious risk of family violence has been identified
That the Victorian Government resource an expansion of co-responder programs across Victoria
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —