Finding into death of Jennifer Ann Grieves
Deceased
Jennifer Ann Grieves
Demographics
70y, female
Date of death
2022-11-27
Finding date
2024-10-29
Cause of death
Perforated diverticulitis
AI-generated summary
A 70-year-old woman with NDIS support living in a Specialist Disability Accommodation presented to hospital with constipation, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. After initial ED assessment and discharge with constipation management, her symptoms worsened and she re-presented 5 days later with haematemesis. She was admitted and stabilised but deteriorated further, with imaging revealing bowel perforation. Given her advance directives (Do Not Resuscitate order and Medical Power of Attorney), surgical intervention was not pursued. She died from perforated diverticulitis. The coroner found no evidence of want of clinical management or care by either the disability accommodation provider or hospital staff that caused or contributed to her death. The case highlights the importance of appropriate management of constipation in vulnerable populations and timely follow-up when symptoms persist despite initial treatment.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Severe constipation not adequately managed after initial ED discharge
- Delay in re-presentation to hospital when symptoms worsened
- Advanced directives (Do Not Resuscitate order) limiting surgical intervention options
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —