Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Mark Andrew Spillane

Deceased

Mark Andrew Spillane

Demographics

58y, male

Date of death

2023-06-10

Finding date

2024-04-11

Cause of death

Septic shock secondary to intra-abdominal collections as sequelae of osteomyelitis/discitis in a man with Trisomy 21

AI-generated summary

A 58-year-old man with Down syndrome and multiple comorbidities died from septic shock secondary to intra-abdominal collections caused by osteomyelitis/discitis of the spine. He initially presented with a foot bone infection detected on imaging in May 2023. Subsequent imaging revealed large bilateral psoas and retroperitoneal collections with L5/S1 osteomyelitis. He was admitted to hospital in June 2023, commenced on antibiotics, and underwent drainage of collections. Despite treatment, his prognosis was poor and further surgery was deemed inappropriate. He became distressed by intravenous access which required removal. He was transitioned to palliative care and died. The coroner found no clinical management failures by either Scope staff or hospital staff that caused or contributed to his death.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • osteomyelitis/discitis of L5/S1 spine
  • intra-abdominal collections (bilateral psoas and retroperitoneal)
  • Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome)
  • poor overall physical health and functional decline
  • inability to tolerate continued intravenous access
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —