Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Gaurav Malhotra

Deceased

Gaurav Malhotra

Demographics

35y, male

Date of death

2022-05-14

Finding date

2024-10-24

Cause of death

Injuries sustained in a train overrun

AI-generated summary

A 35-year-old male died after being struck by a train while heavily intoxicated and under the influence of cocaine. He left home after arriving from a social event, came to be on the railway tracks near Westgarth Station, and was struck by a train at 1:04am. The coroner found the death was due to misadventure while under the influence of alcohol and cocaine. The section of track lacked anti-trespasser fencing. The coroner recommended installing anti-trespasser fencing along the railway line at South Crescent in Northcote to prevent similar deaths. No clinical interventions or medical errors were identified; this was a trauma death resulting from circumstances related to intoxication.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Drugs involved

Contributing factors

  • Heavy intoxication with alcohol
  • Cocaine use
  • Lack of anti-trespasser fencing on railway line
  • Unknown circumstances of how deceased came to be on railway tracks

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Department of Transport and Planning and Metro Trains Melbourne should consider installing anti-trespasser fencing along the railway line at South Crescent in Northcote to prevent like deaths and promote public health and safety
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —