Finding into death of Daniel James Mayes
Deceased
Daniel James Mayes
Demographics
35y, male
Date of death
2021-03-30
Finding date
2024-11-07
Cause of death
Neck compression secondary to hanging
AI-generated summary
Daniel Mayes, a 35-year-old with Type 1 diabetes, died by hanging at his home. His death followed relationship breakdown and online harassment from his former partner and an acquaintance. Three weeks before death, he received abusive messages including content suggesting previous suicide attempt. His mother recognised deteriorating mental health and offered support, which Daniel declined, believing the problem would resolve once the relationship ended. He sent final text messages the day before stating he 'couldn't deal with everything anymore'. No medical error or healthcare failure was identified. The clinical lesson centres on recognising suicide risk in individuals experiencing relationship trauma, online abuse, and mental health deterioration, and the importance of persistent mental health intervention despite initial refusal.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Relationship breakdown and infidelity
- Online bullying and harassment from former partner and acquaintance
- Deteriorating mental health
- Declined mental health support and medication
- Type 1 diabetes (longstanding condition)
- Social isolation and unemployment
Full text
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —