Coronial
VICprison

Finding into death of Jayke Michael Aleckson

Deceased

Jayke Michael Aleckson

Demographics

24y, male

Date of death

2018-10-15

Finding date

2024-12-11

Cause of death

Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy due to hanging

AI-generated summary

Jayke Aleckson, 24, died by hanging in a non-BDRP compliant prison health cell while on remand at Marngoneet Correctional Centre in October 2018. Key clinical lessons: (1) Multiple unmet requests for antidepressant medication despite documented depression history and clear clinical indication—a significant departure from reasonable care standards; (2) Failure to reschedule or rebook psychiatric appointments upon prison transfers, breaking continuity of mental health care; (3) Inadequate risk assessment prior to placement in a non-compliant cell despite T3 vulnerability rating and separation status; (4) Poor documentation quality in mental health records limiting clinical decision-making; (5) System failures in information transfer between prison health providers. Earlier medication initiation and proper psychiatric assessment would have been clinically appropriate, though unlikely to have prevented the impulsive act. The coroner emphasised need for structured handover at transitions, documented risk assessment processes, and ensuring separated prisoners are placed only in BDRP-compliant cells.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate mental health assessment and treatment planning
  • Failure to prescribe antidepressant medication despite multiple documented requests
  • Cancelled psychiatric appointment not remade on prison transfer
  • Placement in non-BDRP compliant cell despite vulnerability (T3) rating
  • Absence of documented risk assessment for separated prisoner placement
  • Isolation and separation from mainstream prison population
  • Inadequate clinical documentation quality
  • System pressures causing use of health cells for separation overflow
  • JCare functionality limitations affecting information continuity
  • Rapid deterioration following separation and further isolation
  • Multiple stressors: family separation, pending court proceedings, witness status

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Separated prisoners should never be placed in non-BDRP compliant cells (now implemented as of February 2020)
  2. Formal, documented risk assessment process must be undertaken before placement of separated prisoners, considering psychiatric history, current presentation, and mental health professional assessment
  3. Scheduled clinical appointments must be remade and tracked during prisoner transfers between facilities
  4. JCare functionality improvements to allow better visibility of referrals, appointments, and longitudinal assessment data
  5. Structured clinical handover processes at points of prisoner transition between facilities
  6. CCTV installed in health ward cells (implemented July 2019)
  7. Removal of leg restraints for prisoners in end-of-life/palliative care (accepted)
  8. Separation Reform Project to ensure separation is last resort only, after 24-hour assessment
  9. Enhanced mental health nursing documentation standards and quality assurance
  10. External expert involvement in Justice Health reviews of custodial deaths (not desktop reviews only)
  11. Formal decision-making and documentation processes for all prisoner placements with risk assessment considerations
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —