Intracranial haemorrhage in the setting of a fall in a man with multiple comorbidities (palliated)
AI-generated summary
An 85-year-old man with multiple comorbidities suffered a fall at home and was transported to hospital with stroke symptoms. A CT brain scan revealed subtle subarachnoid haemorrhage (traumatic), but the VST consultant neurologist missed this finding and recommended thrombolysis. ED clinicians appropriately relied on this expert advice and commenced Alteplase at 10:45pm. The radiologist's report identifying haemorrhage became available at 10:42pm but was not communicated to treating clinicians until 11:23pm—a 40-minute delay. By then, approximately half the thrombolytic infusion had been administered. The thrombolysis caused massive intracranial haemorrhage and death. While preventability could not be established with certainty, critical opportunities to avoid inappropriate treatment were lost due to: (1) the neurologist's missed subtle CT finding, and (2) the radiologist's failure to telephone findings to the referring doctor in accordance with policy and standards. The coroner emphasised that checks and balances like direct communication of urgent findings are essential to prevent such errors.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Missed subtle subarachnoid haemorrhage on initial CT scan interpretation by VST consultant neurologist
40-minute delay in communicating radiologist's findings of subarachnoid haemorrhage to treating clinicians
Radiologist failed to telephone findings to referring doctor in accordance with I-MED policy and RANZCR standards
ED staff (nursing student) accessed the radiologist's report at 10:43pm but did not notify treating clinicians
Thrombolysis administered based on incomplete information regarding intracranial haemorrhage
Coroner's recommendations
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists should consider using the death of Reginald Benham as a case study in educational campaigns or materials highlighting the importance of communicating urgent and significant unexpected radiological findings directly to the referrer, in keeping with their Standards of Practice for Clinical Radiology
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.