Caitlin O'Brien, a 31-year-old nurse, was murdered by her intimate partner Shea Sturt via compression of the neck on 25 June 2019. The coroner identified multiple systemic failures in family violence recognition and risk management. Alfred Health clinicians had documented extensive family violence history, threats to kill, strangulation incidents, and risk factors but failed to complete adequate family violence risk assessments, develop safety plans, or escalate concerns when treating both Ms O'Brien and Mr Sturt. On 23 June 2019, despite documented delusions and aggressive behaviour, Mr Sturt was discharged the same night after psychiatric assessment that appeared to minimise family violence risks and reflect his victim-blaming narrative. Victoria Police attending mental health transfers in September 2018, October 2018, and June 2019 did not identify or report family violence despite knowing the history and observing concerning behaviour. The coroner found that practitioners trained in family violence risk assessment and streamlined MARAM protocols could have identified problematic narratives and potentially altered the outcome through safety planning and appropriate escalation.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Failure to complete adequate family violence risk assessment by Alfred Health mental health clinicians
Failure to develop safety plans for Ms O'Brien despite documented family violence
Inadequate exploration of family violence risk during psychiatric assessment on 23 June 2019
Psychiatric assessment reflected perpetrator's victim-blaming narrative rather than documented risk patterns
Discharge of Mr Sturt the same night despite known family violence history and acute mental health crisis
Failure by Victoria Police to identify and report family violence during mental health transfers
Police did not make proactive enquiries about family violence despite known history at same address
Inadequate communication from Alfred Health to police and paramedics regarding family violence risks
Lack of family violence specific training and systemic processes in mental health services at time of incident
Limited follow-up by Alfred Health after Ms O'Brien declined family violence support services
No application for Family Violence Safety Notice despite documented threats to kill
Coroner's recommendations
Alfred Health and other mental health services should ensure all clinicians receive mandatory training in family violence risk assessment aligned with the MARAM Framework
Mental health services should establish streamlined access to family violence expertise for high-pressure environments where key risks or red flags are present
When a patient with known family violence history presents for mental health assessment, clinicians should conduct formal family violence risk assessments and work with affected parties on safety planning
Mental health clinicians should be alert to victim-blaming narratives presented by perpetrators and ensure prior documented patterns of violence are reflected in assessments and discharge planning
Victoria Police should conduct LEAP checks on premises and persons involved before attending mental health incidents to determine if there is a history of family violence
Victoria Police should make proactive enquiries about family violence risk even where family violence was not the initiating report, particularly in mental health incidents
Police should provide relevant information about safety risks including family violence to examining mental health practitioners regardless of whether examination is in community or hospital
Police should make appropriate referrals for all parties involved in family violence incidents through the Family Violence Portal in line with the Mental Health Protocol
Mental health clinicians should ensure that discharge planning includes communication to police or other agencies where family violence risks are identified
Health services should follow up with patients who decline family violence support services to further explore risks and explore barriers to engagement
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —