Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of Cameron Douglas Boyes

Deceased

Cameron Douglas Boyes

Demographics

43y, male

Date of death

2019-03-25

Finding date

2023-01-04

Cause of death

Multiple injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident (driver)

AI-generated summary

Cameron Boyes, a 43-year-old man, died in a high-speed motor vehicle collision after his engagement was called off. He had contacted mental health services on 23 March 2019 reporting suicidal ideation and sleep deprivation. His GP declined benzodiazepines and attempted to arrange voluntary psychiatric admission, which he refused. Police conducted a welfare check but determined he did not meet criteria for involuntary detention under the Mental Health Act. A subsequent involuntary admission order was faxed to police but not received. Cameron deliberately drove at 217 km/h through an intersection, striking an embankment and ejecting his passenger Angela. The coroner concluded Cameron intended to kill both himself and Angela. While Dr M. and police demonstrated professionalism, the failure of the faxed involuntary order to reach police prevented intervention that may have prevented this tragedy.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Deterioration in mental health following relationship breakdown
  • Suicidal ideation not adequately addressed
  • Failure of involuntary admission order fax transmission to police
  • Refusal to engage with voluntary mental health admission
  • Inadequate risk assessment during police welfare check
  • Limited follow-up after initial mental health triage assessment
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —