Complications of carotid artery injury from central line insertion in the setting of surgery for metastatic carcinoma
AI-generated summary
Susan Royals, a 74-year-old woman with metastatic colon cancer, died from complications of carotid artery injury sustained during central venous catheter (CVC) insertion as part of a Whipple procedure and hemicolectomy. The CVC was inadvertently placed in the right carotid artery, leading to right cerebral hemisphere watershed ischaemia despite surgical repair. She subsequently developed multi-organ failure and died. While arterial puncture is a recognised 6-9% complication of CVC insertion, ultrasound guidance—now considered gold standard—was used but not documented. Northern Health implemented comprehensive remedial actions including mandatory safety steps for CVC placement confirmation, standardised documentation, requirement for ultrasound-guided insertion, and multi-disciplinary intra-operative planning. The coroner commended these proactive improvements and made no adverse findings against clinicians.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Central venous catheter misplaced in right carotid artery
Delayed insertion of CVC due to uncertainty regarding procedure progression
Clinician fatigue at time of CVC insertion
Limited safety barriers to confirm correct CVC placement
Limited documentation of CVC insertion on anaesthetic chart
Right cerebral hemisphere watershed ischaemia following carotid injury
Coroner's recommendations
Safer Care Victoria develops a standardised approach for CVC insertion which encourages the use of ultrasound guided insertion (and other methods of confirming venous placement) to reduce the likelihood of instances of arterial puncture
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.