A 78-year-old man died from rupture of a previously undiagnosed 7.1cm abdominal aortic aneurysm. A CT scan ordered for suspected renal colic incidentally discovered the aneurysm and recommended vascular review. The GP appropriately referred the patient to vascular surgery but the referral was lost in transmission via fax. The radiologist did not directly contact the referring doctor about this critical finding. The GP did not recognize the significance of the patient's transient abdominal pain in the context of an asymptomatic aneurysm and did not refer him to emergency despite guidelines recommending urgent assessment for symptomatic cases. The patient presented late with non-specific symptoms and declined hospital attendance, dying at home. Key preventability factors: unclear referral criteria regarding transient pain, failed fax transmission, lack of direct radiologist communication, and delayed recognition of symptomatic status.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Lack of clarity in Statewide Referral Criteria regarding transient pain and when to refer symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms to emergency department
Radiologist did not directly contact the referring GP to discuss the significant finding of a 7.1cm abdominal aortic aneurysm
Failure of fax transmission of the referral from the GP practice to Royal Melbourne Hospital vascular surgery outpatient clinic
Absence of feedback mechanism to the referring doctor regarding receipt or non-receipt of the referral
GP's decision to refer to outpatient clinic rather than emergency department, influenced by perceived risk of COVID-19 exposure
Patient's reluctance to present to hospital despite wife's concerns
Lack of recognition that transient abdominal pain in context of large aneurysm warranted emergency assessment
Coroner's recommendations
The Victorian Department of Health consider amending the wording of the Statewide Referral Criteria regarding aortic aneurysms to clarify which patients should be discussed with the vascular registrar or sent to an emergency department, including the significance of transient symptoms.
FMIG Imaging remind their radiologists of their obligations to contact referring doctors directly to discuss any significant unexpected, urgent, or critical clinical radiology findings.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.