Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Heather Jean Lucas

Deceased

Heather Jean Lucas

Demographics

80y, female

Coroner

Coroner Darren Bracken

Date of death

2020-03-20

Finding date

2022-10-18

Cause of death

Anaphylaxis complicating chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic fallopian tube cancer, in a woman with ischaemic heart disease

AI-generated summary

Ms Heather Jean Lucas, 80-year-old woman with metastatic fallopian tube cancer, died from anaphylaxis during her third carboplatin chemotherapy infusion. She had experienced a documented Grade 2 hypersensitivity reaction to carboplatin during her second treatment on 28 February 2020. Despite premedication with steroids and antihistamines, she developed anaphylaxis on 20 March 2020 within minutes of carboplatin administration. Critical clinical lessons: platinum-containing chemotherapy agents carry high risk of recurrent anaphylaxis upon rechallenge (approximately 50% recurrence); international guidelines recommend against rechallenging patients with prior anaphylactic symptoms regardless of premedication; first-line anaphylaxis treatment (epinephrine) was not immediately administered; medical presence at the bedside during drug administration was absent initially. The coroner recommended enhanced grading systems, physician presence during rechallenge, improved adverse drug reaction documentation, and explicit allergy recording in patient assessment tools.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

oncologyemergency medicineanaesthesiapathology

Error types

medicationcommunicationsystemproceduraldelay

Drugs involved

carboplatingemcitabineantihistaminessteroidshydrocortisonepromethazine

Clinical conditions

anaphylaxismetastatic fallopian tube cancerischaemic heart diseaseplatinum hypersensitivity reactionchemotherapy-induced hypersensitivity

Procedures

chemotherapy administrationintravenous infusion

Contributing factors

  • rechallenge with carboplatin despite prior hypersensitivity reaction
  • lack of medical presence in Day Oncology Unit at bedside during drug administration
  • absence of first-line anaphylaxis treatment (epinephrine) immediately available and administered
  • inaccurate adverse drug reaction documentation in Patient Assessment Tool
  • use of non-first-line medications (hydrocortisone and promethazine) rather than epinephrine as initial treatment
  • absence of recognised grading scale for hypersensitivity reactions
  • inadequate informed consent documentation regarding rechallenge risks

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Cabrini Health review the grading scale utilised in the Platinum Hypersensitivity Reaction Guideline and consider implementing a recognised scale with detailed signs and symptoms for each grade to reduce possibility of underestimation of severity
  2. Cabrini Health review procedures to ensure an appropriately qualified, trained and equipped medical practitioner is at the bedside during administration of chemotherapy agents in patients undergoing rechallenge, at least for administration and for a period within which adverse reactions would manifest, and that patients with Grade 2 or greater prior reactions will not be rechallenged
  3. Cabrini Health review record keeping processes and procedures including the Adverse Drug Reaction System to ensure all adverse drug reactions are recorded timely on all databases and are explicitly considered before any rechallenge
  4. Patient Assessment Tool – Day Oncology be amended to allow explicit recording of allergic reactions to reduce reliance on patient recall
  5. Cabrini Health implement these processes and procedures across all its campuses
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.