Vlado Micetic, 44, was fatally shot by Leading Senior Constable Timothy Baker during a traffic interception for stolen number plates in Windsor, Victoria, on 25 August 2013. Baker claimed Micetic produced a knife during arrest and he shot in self-defence. The coroner found the death was preventable, primarily due to Baker working single-officer patrol despite a 2010 coronial recommendation against this practice. While unable to definitively establish whether Micetic produced a knife, the coroner found Baker's account inconsistent with audio-visual evidence. Critical issues included Baker's unmonitored mental health (bipolar disorder, PTSD, depression), inadequate fitness-for-duty assessments by police medical officers, and the 3-year delay in implementing single-officer patrol restrictions. The coroner recommended Victoria Police develop systems to ensure members' mental and physical fitness for duty is adequately assessed and monitored.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
inadequate fitness for duty assessment of police officer
mental health monitoring failure
delay in implementing prior coronial recommendation
police operational procedures
Coroner's recommendations
The Chief Commissioner of Police should develop and maintain a system to ensure Victoria Police remains adequately informed about their members' fitness for duty, particularly ensuring members are both physically and psychologically fit for duty without violating individual rights to privacy.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —