Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Walentyna Huczyk

Deceased

Walentyna Huczyk

Demographics

95y, female

Date of death

2019-07-19

Finding date

2021-03-29

Cause of death

Complications post scooter versus car incident

AI-generated summary

A 95-year-old woman died from complications of injuries sustained in a collision between her motorised mobility scooter and a car while crossing Raymond Street in Sale. She suffered flail chest, hemopneumothorax, and spinal fractures, and deteriorated in ICU with delirium before dying three days later. The driver was deemed to have driven reasonably. The coroner used this case to highlight the significant public health issue of mobility scooter-related deaths, noting that 69 Australians aged 60+ died from such incidents between 2006–2016, with 64% involving vehicle collisions and 45% occurring while crossing roads. The coroner recommended a targeted public awareness campaign to improve mobility scooter safety.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Mobility scooter visibility obscured by stationary vehicle
  • Road crossing hazard for mobility scooter users
  • Elderly user operating mobility scooter in traffic environment

Coroner's recommendations

  1. The Victorian Department of Transport implement a targeted public awareness campaign to highlight the risks associated with motorised mobility scooters as a potential traffic hazard
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —