Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Jason Phillip Gilham

Deceased

Jason Phillip Gilham

Demographics

27y, male

Date of death

2018-12-15

Finding date

2021-01-14

Cause of death

Immersion in the setting of a motor vehicle incident

AI-generated summary

Jason Gilham, 27, died from immersion when the vehicle he was a passenger in left the Western Ring Road at a bend and became submerged in a dam. The driver (also deceased) had a history of vasovagal syncope investigated in 2011 with normal cardiac findings, but exhaustive investigation could not definitively establish why the vehicle left the road. The coroner ruled out mechanical failure, alcohol (passenger had consumed 2 beers), driver distraction, and concluded it unlikely the driver suffered a medical event. Key clinical lessons: syncope risk stratification and follow-up completion are important even when initial investigations appear normal; unexplained loss of consciousness while driving requires thorough investigation and may warrant driving restrictions pending further evaluation.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Vehicle departure from roadway at curve
  • Inadequate roadside safety barrier at location near body of water
  • Possible but unconfirmed medical event in driver (syncope history)

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Using the risk-based 'safe system approach', the Department of Transport should conduct a review of Victorian roads in the vicinity of 'bodies of water', to identify and consider whether safety barriers should be installed or extended to protect against potential water hazards.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —