Finding into death of Gwen Adeline Smith
Deceased
Gwen Adeline Smith
Demographics
91y, female
Date of death
2018-07-25
Finding date
2021-05-07
Cause of death
Gunshot wound to the head
AI-generated summary
Gwen Adeline Smith, 91, was fatally shot by her husband Arthur Smith on 25 July 2018 at their home in Parwan, Victoria. Mr Smith then died by suicide. The couple had been experiencing significant stressors including financial difficulties, property maintenance challenges, and concerns about loss of independence following Mr Smith's recent heart valve replacement and hospitalization. An aged care assessment conducted on 24 July 2018 had arranged in-home supports to enable them to remain at home. There were no identified warnings of family violence prior to the incident, and services involved were focused on health needs rather than prevention of intimate partner violence. This case exemplifies elderly homicide-suicide, characterized by long-term marriage, declining health, and external stressors. The coroner found no evidence of Mrs Smith's awareness or agreement to Mr Smith's actions.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Procedures
Contributing factors
- intimate partner violence
- financial stress and debt
- concerns about loss of independence
- property maintenance burden
- Mr Smith's declining health following cardiac surgery
- social isolation
- resistance to relocation or major life changes
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —