Mark Capovilla, a 39-year-old man with severe intellectual disability, epilepsy, and dysphagia, died from choking on food at his day program. He had a documented choking risk but lacked a current mealtime support plan at either his residential unit or day service. Critical communication failures occurred: his choking risk was not effectively communicated from his residential provider (DHHS) to Aurora Support Services. While staff at his residence implemented appropriate precautions (small pieces, close supervision, drinks with meals), Aurora classified him as an independent eater requiring no one-to-one supervision. The coroner found the death preventable due to inadequate communication and absence of formal mealtime support plans. Both organisations have since implemented improvements including better inter-agency communication, swallowing checklists, and staff training on choking management.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general practiceforensic medicineemergency medicineparamedicine
Error types
communicationsystemdiagnostic
Clinical conditions
severe intellectual disabilityepilepsydysphagiagastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseautism spectrum disorderchoking
Procedures
CPRlaryngeal mask airway insertionsuctioning
Contributing factors
Inadequate communication between DHHS and Aurora Support Services regarding choking risk
Absence of current mealtime support plan at day program
Misclassification of Mark as independent eater despite documented dysphagia
Insufficient mealtime support information available to staff at Aurora
Failure to recognise and act on signs of choking risk in day program setting
Health decline in 2016-2017 not adequately reflected in care plans
Documented choking risk from 2016 NASIC assessment not communicated to day service
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.