Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Marilyn June Burdon

Deceased

Marilyn June Burdon

Demographics

70y, female

Date of death

2017-08-21

Finding date

2021-09-21

Cause of death

Gunshot wounds to the head and chest

AI-generated summary

Marilyn June Burdon, aged 70, was fatally shot by her intimate partner Charles Bisucci on 21 August 2017 in Kew, Victoria. Bisucci subsequently took his own life. Critical systemic failures enabled this preventable intimate partner homicide: (1) Firearms regulation failures allowed Bisucci, a prohibited person since 2004, to maintain illegal access to firearms through friends and associates despite a cancelled firearms licence; (2) A 2014 police investigation into missing firearms was inadequate, with insufficient follow-up enquiries and failure to escalate to firearms licensing authorities; (3) Bisucci's psychiatrist did not receive family violence training and was unaware of his violent history and ongoing illegal firearms access, limiting risk assessment capabilities; (4) Victoria Police lacked systemic checks linking prohibited persons to firearm permit applications. Multiple interventions—robust 2014 investigation, enhanced firearms licensing controls, and mandatory family violence training for psychiatrists—could have prevented this death. The coroner emphasised systemic gaps rather than individual clinician error regarding psychiatric care.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate 2014 police investigation into missing firearms registered to prohibited person
  • Failure of Victoria Police Licensing and Regulation Division to follow up on missing firearms notifications
  • Gaps in firearms regulation system allowing prohibited persons to retain access to firearms through associates
  • Fraudulent firearms permit applications and forged documentation by prohibited person
  • Lack of cross-referencing systems in LARS/LEAP to identify prohibited persons linked to firearm permit addresses
  • Inadequate psychiatric assessment of family violence risk by private psychiatrist
  • Absence of mandatory family violence training for private psychiatrists
  • Intimate partner violence precipitated by deceased's rejection of perpetrator
  • Perpetrator's severe depression, personality disorder traits, and history of fraud and dishonesty

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Victoria Police must update IT systems so serial number searches provide all previous registered owners, or mandate contact with LRD when obtaining such information
  2. Victoria Police LRD must check when assessing Permit to Acquire applications whether the witness is a previous firearm owner, a prohibited person, or if storage address is linked to a prohibited person, and investigate or refuse permit accordingly
  3. Victoria Police must update policies so that upon notification of address changes, LRD establishes whether the new address is common to a prohibited person and commences investigation if so
  4. Victoria Police must require immediate notification to LRD upon identification of missing/unregistered firearms, with LRD providing all relevant LARS intelligence and assistance
  5. Victoria Police should consider updating firearms safety courses to include education about licence holder responsibilities and offences under the Firearms Act 1996, with demonstration of understanding required
  6. Victoria Police should consider providing information brochures about licence holder responsibilities with renewals and new permits
  7. The Victorian Attorney-General should consider requesting the Sentencing Advisory Council review sentencing outcomes under the Firearms Act 1996
  8. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists should mandate that not less than four hours of the 50 hours annual continuing medical education required relate to Family Violence (identification, risk assessment, relevant frameworks) within a two-year period
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —