Finding into death of NB
Deceased
NB
Demographics
1y, male
Date of death
2016-12-23
Finding date
2021-08-04
Cause of death
Global cerebral ischaemia in an infant with upper airway obstruction
AI-generated summary
NB, a 14-month-old with a tracheostomy requiring overnight nursing support in foster care, suffered a cardiac arrest on 17 December 2016 that resulted in severe hypoxic brain injury and death. The overnight nurse (Ms Jarina) failed to recognise early signs of tracheostomy obstruction (gasping, cyanosis, apnoea) and did not perform appropriate emergency airway management. She did not suction the tracheostomy or change the tube, instead providing ineffective CPR without adequate ventilation through the tracheostomy. The foster carer (Mrs Patterson) also failed to assess or manage the airway during resuscitation. Contributing system failures included inadequate training of agency nursing staff in emergency tracheostomy management, poor communication between the hospital (RCH), child protection department (DHHS), and nursing agency (Colbrow) about training standards, and the RCH's decision not to directly train agency staff despite holding specialised knowledge. The 3-hour in-house training provided by Colbrow was insufficient and did not include emergency procedures. Earlier appropriate airway assessment and intervention could likely have prevented death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Failure to recognise early signs of tracheostomy obstruction (gasping, cyanosis, stiffening)
- Nurse did not assess airway patency or suction the tracheostomy tube prior to CPR
- Nurse did not perform emergency tracheostomy tube change
- Ineffective CPR without adequate ventilation through the tracheostomy
- Inappropriate positioning and back pats instead of proper emergency management
- Foster carer also failed to assess airway during resuscitation and presumed nurse had already suctioned
- Inadequate training of agency nurses in emergency tracheostomy management
- 3-hour in-house training by Colbrow did not include emergency procedures or tube changing
- Poor communication between RCH, DHHS and Colbrow regarding training standards
- RCH did not effectively communicate to DHHS the specialised nature of training required
- RCH declined to train agency nurses despite holding specialised expertise
- Nursing agency did not arrange appropriate training equivalent to RCH standards
- Lack of clear delineation of responsibility between organisations for training oversight
- Prolonged period without effective ventilation (21 minutes before paramedics suctioned and replaced tube)
Coroner's recommendations
- To the RCH: Where RCH provides advice as to healthcare needs of a child subject to Children's Court orders, that advice should be communicated in writing to DHHS and recorded in DHHS's CRIS system and provided in writing to those providing immediate care and welfare of the child, as well as to the Children's court, parties and legal representatives, including where relevant the Court-appointed independent children's lawyer
- To RCH, DHHS and Department of Health: Consider, develop and expand models for embedding healthcare knowledge within Child Protection, including wider roll out of the Vulnerable Children's Health Project
- To RCH and DHHS: Review current memorandum of understanding between the two organisations to strengthen relationships and clarify ambiguities, particularly to ensure discharge planning delineates roles and responsibilities of care where a third party agency is involved, specifically clarifying whose responsibility is to ensure adequate training for staff caring for patients with tracheostomy at home and whose responsibility is to ascertain capacity of attending staff to assess and manage evolving tracheostomy emergency in home environment
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —