Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Julian Victor Charles Bareuther

Deceased

JULIAN VICTOR CHARLES BAREUTHER

Demographics

68y, male

Date of death

2019-09-24

Finding date

2020

Cause of death

PLASTIC BAG AND NITROGEN GAS ASPHYXIA

AI-generated summary

68-year-old man with terminal, inoperable pancreatic cancer died by asphyxiation using a plastic bag and nitrogen gas. He sought access to Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) through his GP, Dr C., who assessed him as mentally well with full cognitive capacity, though distressed about his terminal condition. VAD was denied because Mr Bareuther was not an Australian citizen, despite living in Australia for 40 years, being an Electoral Roll member, and having paid taxes. Following this denial, he ceased medical contact and died by his own deliberate action two weeks later. The case highlights a systemic gap: the VAD legislative framework lacked discretion for non-citizens with terminal illness. The coroner expressed sympathy for Mr Bareuther's situation and implicit concern that rigid eligibility criteria may have contributed to this preventable death.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Terminal inoperable pancreatic cancer
  • Denial of Voluntary Assisted Dying due to non-citizen status
  • Lack of discretion in VAD eligibility criteria
  • Social isolation with limited support network
  • Cessation of medical contact after VAD denial

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Consideration of discretion within the VAD legislative framework to address eligibility gaps for non-citizens with terminal illness residing in Australia
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —