Finding into death of MRS M
Deceased
Mrs M
Demographics
91y, female
Date of death
2019-02-10
Finding date
2020-10-21
Cause of death
Complications of pelvic fractures sustained in a fall
AI-generated summary
A 91-year-old woman with osteoporosis and multiple comorbidities sustained pelvic fractures in a mechanical fall at home. She presented to the ED where initial hip x-ray showed no fracture. She deteriorated with hypotension and was treated with antibiotics for presumed pneumonia. She suffered cardiac arrest shortly after antibiotic administration and died. Post-mortem CT revealed pelvic fractures missed on initial imaging. Key clinical lessons: the initial hip x-ray failed to detect pelvic fractures that contributed to her deterioration; elderly trauma patients with mechanism for pelvic injury warrant high-quality imaging (CT pelvis); the deterioration appeared multifactorial (trauma, anaemia, cardiorespiratory strain) rather than due to antibiotic allergy. Medical records documented previous penicillin 'side effects' (GI upset) rather than true allergy, and the patient and husband correctly reported no allergies. The coroner found care reasonable and appropriate, but highlighted risks of fragmented electronic health records and the benefit of integrated EMR systems.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Missed pelvic fractures on initial hip x-ray imaging
- Underlying anaemia
- Strain on cardiorespiratory system from trauma and multiple comorbidities
- Fragmented electronic health record systems limiting accessible allergy information
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —