Finding into death of Marek Koziol
Deceased
Marek Koziol
Demographics
61y, male
Date of death
2018-05-20
Finding date
2020-07-07
Cause of death
Injuries sustained in motor vehicle collision (pedestrian)
AI-generated summary
A 61-year-old legally blind man was struck by a motor vehicle while crossing a busy highway with his guide dog. He sustained severe head injuries including subarachnoid and subdural haemorrhage, and diffuse axonal injury, and died after 14 days in ICU despite appropriate trauma care. The collision occurred because the vehicle emitted minimal noise (33dB, similar to library levels), making it unlikely the visually impaired pedestrian could detect it aurally before stepping onto the road. The driver was not impaired, speeding, or negligent. The death was deemed a tragic accident. The coroner recommended Guide Dogs Victoria incorporate training addressing challenges posed by modern low-noise vehicles.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Clinical conditions
Procedures
Contributing factors
- Low noise emission of modern motor vehicle (33dB)
- Visual impairment limiting detection of oncoming traffic
- Recent acquisition of guide dog (less than one year)
- Road crossing decision-making reliant on auditory cues in absence of adequate visual input
Coroner's recommendations
- Guide Dogs Victoria consider incorporating into their training programs strategies to address the challenges associated with some modern motor vehicles that emit lower noise levels and to visually impaired people as they move around in public, whether assisted by guide dogs or otherwise
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —