Stephen Myall, a 59-year-old magistrate, died by hanging in March 2018. He was a dedicated judicial officer with exceptional work ethic but experienced significant occupational stress from increasing court workloads (up to 90 cases daily), pressure to ensure justice for unrepresented persons, media criticism of decisions, and concerns about systemic justice issues. He had accrued 90 days of leave but was reluctant to take it. One month before death he attended a judicial wellbeing workshop. Recent media criticism of an adjournment decision troubled him. His wife noted he appeared stressed and 'brittle' the week before death, though colleagues observed no change. He had no documented mental health history and did not access available counselling services. The coroner identified work-related stressors as predominant but could not quantify their individual contribution. The case prompted significant systemic changes to judicial wellbeing support.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Contributing factors
Occupational stress from ever-increasing court workloads
Media criticism of judicial decisions
Concern about systemic justice issues and legislative sentencing restrictions
Long working hours and reluctance to take leave
Worry and agonising over court decisions
Pressure to ensure unrepresented persons were not disadvantaged
Recent unfavourable media coverage of an adjournment decision
Coroner's recommendations
The coroner stated 'I do not consider any meaningful recommendations under the Act can be made' but noted the Magistrates' Court of Victoria's subsequent implementation of substantial measures including: monthly chamber days for decision writing, four wellbeing days annually with no court duties, professional wellbeing supervision with external psychologists, limiting daily court list sizes, revised practice directions on court sitting times, new Strategic Advisor position for listings and allocations, extended Judicial Officers Assistance Program, full medical assessments every two years, and revised induction programs for new magistrates
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —