Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Keith Walter Sharp

Deceased

Keith Walter Sharp

Demographics

63y, male

Coroner

Coroner Simon McGregor

Date of death

2017-06-02

Finding date

2020-02-28

Cause of death

Cerebral infarction complicating vertebral artery dissection following motor vehicle collision

AI-generated summary

Keith Walter Sharp, 63, sustained a motor vehicle collision causing vertebral artery dissection and subsequent cerebral infarction. At Albury Base Hospital, initial CT imaging at 10:44am identified significant cervical spine injuries, but critical imaging results (MRI and CT angiogram) were delayed approximately 4.5 hours. The patient deteriorated acutely around 5:15pm during further imaging. While early transfer to Royal Melbourne Hospital for possible interventional radiology might have offered limited benefit given stroke timing and logistics, systemic failures were identified: poor documentation, inadequate senior supervision, delayed imaging ordering, lack of awareness by the shift leader of critical results, and gaps in trauma referral pathways. The coroner noted the internal incident review was superficial and failed to explore underlying systemic causes or identify all contributing factors. Preventability remains uncertain given the rarity of bilateral vertebral artery injuries and the narrow therapeutic window.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicineradiologytrauma surgeryintensive careneurology

Error types

delaydiagnosticcommunicationsystem

Drugs involved

aspirinmetoprololpantoprazolelinagliptin/metforminezetimibe/atorvastatinmorphinemidazolam

Clinical conditions

vertebral artery dissectionblunt traumatic cerebrovascular injurycervical spine injurycerebral infarctionbasilar artery thrombosisc5/c6 disc disruption

Procedures

CT scanMRI scanCT angiogramintubationair retrievalmechanical thrombectomy (considered but not performed)

Contributing factors

  • Blunt traumatic bilateral vertebral artery dissection
  • Approximately 4.5 hour delay in ordering and completing imaging investigations
  • Poor documentation by emergency department medical staff
  • Lack of senior emergency department medical staff supervision
  • Emergency physician in charge unaware of initial CT results and delays
  • Failure to incorporate state-wide trauma referral pathways into local hospital policy
  • Nursing staff unable to remain with patient during MRI due to workload
  • Delayed recognition of deterioration risk
  • Lack of verbal reporting of critical MRI findings to clinical staff

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Albury Wodonga Health Safety and Quality Department should repeat their investigation with an external expert in emergency department trauma process management to identify better opportunities for system improvements
  2. Education of medical staff regarding medico-legal obligations regarding documentation
  3. Development of policy that category I trauma cases are overseen by the senior ED doctor
  4. Incorporation of trauma referral pathways into local policy including display of ARV posters in resuscitation rooms
  5. Updating policy for nurses and doctors to stay with critically ill patients when transported out of department
  6. Implementation of rapid screening of CT pan-scan images by radiologist while patient is still in scanner
  7. Consideration of whether CT angiogram alone would suffice rather than staged imaging
  8. Direct communication of potentially critical CT results to emergency physician in charge
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.