Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Vladimir Mark Makovnik

Deceased

Vladimir Mark Makovnik

Demographics

27y, male

Date of death

2017-03-24

Finding date

2020-06-30

Cause of death

Injuries sustained in motor vehicle collision (driver)

AI-generated summary

A 27-year-old male died from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision while performing a U-turn in his work utility vehicle. He was directing traffic signage as part of his employment when he attempted to turn across traffic on Skipton Road. While stopped partway through the U-turn to give way to another vehicle, a truck appeared around a blind bend. The deceased then drove forward into the path of the oncoming truck, resulting in a fatal collision. The coroner found no mechanical defects in the work vehicle that contributed to the collision. Investigation confirmed the deceased had not been under the influence of alcohol or drugs. This case highlights hazards of roadwork positioning and visibility issues at intersections, though the primary cause was the deceased's driving decision to move into the path of an approaching vehicle.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • U-turn manoeuvre at intersection blocking northbound lane
  • Stopped vehicle in traffic lane to give way to other traffic
  • Blind leftward bend in Skipton Road obscuring view of approaching truck
  • Speed of oncoming truck (80-90 km/h) limiting ability to avoid collision
  • Deceased drove into path of oncoming truck after horn warning
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —