Coronial
VICmental health

Finding into death of Harley Robert Larking

Deceased

Harley Robert Larking

Demographics

23y, male

Date of death

2016-05-13

Finding date

2020-09-18

Cause of death

Effects of fire

AI-generated summary

Harley Larking, a 23-year-old Aboriginal man with treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder, died from effects of fire on 13 May 2016 while absconding from a psychiatric unit. He was on clozapine for only two weeks when trialled unsupervised in the Low Dependency Unit under staff shortage conditions. Key clinical lessons: (1) the decision to trial LDU was reasonable but the staff shortage was a concerning factor that should have prompted deferral; (2) observations at predictable 30-minute intervals were suboptimal—variable timing is preferable for high absconding risk patients; (3) a known environmental risk (easily scalable courtyard fence) was not addressed for over a year despite Victoria Police concerns; (4) cultural competence was inadequately embedded despite senior support and an Aboriginal liaison officer—whole-team training is essential; (5) missing patient notification procedures were ambiguous and staff unfamiliar, impairing police response. The death likely resulted from accidental misadventure rather than suicide. Improved fence height, policy clarity, staff training, and culturally safe practices could have reduced preventable harm.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Absconding from Low Dependency Unit via easily scalable courtyard fence
  • Staff shortage on day of trial (no late shift nurse)
  • Predictable observation schedule (30-minute intervals) allowing undetected departure
  • Only two weeks on clozapine (titration phase, not yet optimal)
  • Known fence risk identified April 2015 but not remedied by May 2016
  • Ambiguous and unclear missing patient policies at NWMHS
  • Staff unfamiliar with missing patient procedures and Kelly memo 2013
  • Inadequate whole-staff cultural competence training despite liaison officer
  • Brief phone call to police without confirmation of receipt or recording of officer details
  • Police failure to record or act on missing person call

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Review policy and procedures for monitoring involuntary patients in line with Department of Health 2013 nursing observation guidelines, with focus on unpredictability of observation timing to prevent routinisation
  2. Implement secure electronic transmission process to replace facsimile system for missing patient notifications to police
  3. Enter both actual and attempted absconding instances in Riskman and reconcile with Victoria Police records
  4. Specify that compulsory inpatients absconding for more than 15 minutes be reported to police (absent documented treating psychiatrist rationale otherwise) and recorded in Riskman
  5. Review and rationalise missing persons policies across Melbourne Health to ensure plain English, consistency, and clarity of steps and timeframes
  6. Provide regular staff training on missing/absconded person policies with audits to ensure appropriate reporting to external agencies
  7. Implement Aboriginal cultural competency training for all inpatient psychiatric staff including focus on working with Koori workers and culturally informed treatment planning
  8. Northern Health to establish system for prioritising environmental risk remediation with escalation to governing body if risks not managed timely
  9. Office of Chief Psychiatrist to review other public mental health inpatient units regarding Aboriginal mental health liaison officer availability and cultural competence embedding
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —